Volume 22, Issue 1 (4-2012)                   J Holist Nurs Midwifery 2012, 22(1): 54-60 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Emami Sigaroodi A, Salsali M, Basiri H. Comparative survey between quantitative and qualitative paradigms (part II)‎. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2012; 22 (1) :54-60
URL: http://hnmj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-179-en.html
1- , kasraema‏2004‏@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (5857 Views)

As stated in the first part of article, we have stated the four major philosophical paradigms ‎which make up the basis for knowledge(epistemology), the nature and reality(ontology) and ‎the acquisition methods of knowledge(methodology). Thus, according to each paradigm, ‎approach to knowledge is determined. ‎‏ ‏ In a more general category, we have two quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Today that ‎method is called quantitative or scientific method, derived from positivism. On this basis, only ‎the experimental scientific method is valid method of research. On the other hand, qualitative ‎methods focused on natural position therefore, these studies are sometimes called naturalistic ‎study. ‎ Since paradigmatic confrontation occurs in fundamental questions of each paradigm, ‎researchers use different sources to determine two paradigms' answer to basic questions, and ‎tables are made to comprise them. Finally the importance of each was emphasized.‎

Full-Text [PDF 258 kb]   (26997 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (2288 Views)  
Article Type : Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2014/08/3 | Accepted: 2014/08/3 | Published: 2014/08/3

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.