The Relationship between the Study habits and the Academic performance of Medical Sciences Students
Hayede Rezaie Looyeh1, Seyede Fateme Seyed Fazelpour2*, Shadman Reza Masoule2, Minoo Mitra Chehrzad3, Ehsan Kazem Nejad Leili4
1Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
2Department of Nursing, Instructor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
3Social Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Department of Nursing (Pediatrics), Instructor, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
4Social Determinants of Health Research Center (SDHRC), Bio-Statistics, Associate Professor, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
*Corresponding author: School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rasht.
E-mail: f_fazelpour@yahoo.com
Received: 2015March 01; Accepted: 2015September 04
Abstract
Introduction: Students’ study methods affect their learning and academic achievement, and the resultant process plays a role in the development cognitive and practical skills, and ultimately their future career. Determining the students' study habits and the relationship between their study habits and their academic performance can, therefore, improve their academic achievement, strengthen and modify their study habits.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the relationship between the study habits and the academic performance of the students of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences.
Materials and Methods: This analytical-descriptive study conducted between 2013 and2014, samples comprising 461 students from different courses at the Guilan University of Medical Sciences were selected based on a stratified random sampling method. The data collection tools included Palsane and Sharma Study Habit Inventory (PSSHI) with 8 areas (division of time, physical status, ability to read, noting, learning motivation, memory, exams, and wellness) and 45 items. The data from this research were analysed using mean descriptive and inferential statistical tests, standard deviation, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, and multiple regressions with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results: The mean of the overall status of the students’ study habits was 48.35 ± 10.37 from 90. The academic performance of the majority (67.2%) of the students was estimated to belong to the intermediate level. Data suggests that the academic performance of the students had the highest correlation with the field of noting (p < 0.0001 and r = 0.234), while the lowest correlation was with the wellness area (p = 0.03 and r = 0.101). In general, the correlation between study habits and academic performance was significant (p < 0.0001 and r = 0.229). In addition, the study habits score can predict 6.8% of the changes in academic performance (R2 = 0.068).
Conclusion: The results showed that the study habits of the students are at a relatively good or average level. In addition, owing to the existence of a significant relationship between study habits and academic performance, education administrators and planners can enhance students' study habits with the inclusion of appropriate educational content, especially their skills of noting and reading their notes, and thus improve their academic performance. There is a significant relationship between the study habits of students and their academic performance.
Keywords: Learning, Students, Universities
Introduction
Academic performance is a skill that students obtain from school, college, and university through the time spent in the classroom, the lab, or the library [1]. Enhancement of academic performance leads to academic achievement; an improvement in academic achievement results in national development and the delivery of efficient forces [2].
It seems that study habits are the most important predictor-variables in academic performance [3-5]. Study habits are the methods of study used by students during an academic course within an appropriate environment; in other words, it is the ability of students to manage time for the successful accomplishment of academic tasks [6]. According to the definition presented by Azikiwie, Bajwa et al. introduces study habits as the method selected by the student for private study or the technique used to dominate a topic after classroom learning [7]. Study habits play an important role in academic success, and effective study cannot be conducted without using these skills. Students who have better academic achievements adopt a wider utilization of these skills than those who make poor progress [8]. According to the statistics, about one third of university students are at risk of academic failure [9]. Investigating the causes of academic failure of the students at the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Dehbozorgi and Mooseli found that 43.4% of the unsuccessful students had no plans for studying [10]. People who do not have enough information on study strategies will not have effective and sustainable learning practices, despite all the time that they spend studying [11]. In their article, Abd Khodaei and Ghaffari reported that there is a relationship between study strategies and the achievement of success in studies [12].
Based on Pankison, Rana, and Kausar study assert that students who have more effective study habits get higher scores in comparison to students with ineffective study habits [13]. In various studies, the skills and habits of students have been reported differently. Parto studied the academic achievement of nursing students and identified the factors related to the academic achievement of students [14].
Since medical students work with a great deal of information during their studies, they need to use new strategies for organization and learning [15]. Since there is a relationship between the study habits and the academic performances of different students, this study aimed to determine the relationship between these study habits and academic performances so that we could present recommendations for academic achievements, and the enhancement and modification of study habits in students through the investigation of study skills and the identification of the related factors.
Materials and Methods
The study sample consisted of 515 students of the different colleges affiliated with the Guilan University of Medical Sciences; these colleges were selected based on the results of Fereiduni Moghadam, and Cheraghyan [16], which possessed 95% confidence interval and 80% test power by stratified random sampling in the academic year of 2013–2014. The loss of samples was calculated to be 10%. 461 out of 515 questionnaires were delivered after the completion of the research. All the students studying at the Guilan University of Medical Sciences, apart from the guest- and the transferred students who had completed only one semester, could enter the study as samples.
The data collection tools included a questionnaire in two parts. The first part included the students’ demographic information; this section contained 12 questions. The second part of the questionnaire included a study of Palsane and Sharma Study Habit Inventory (PSSHI); this section contained 45 questions. PSSHI measures the students' study habits in 8 domains: division of time, physical status, ability to read, noting, learning motivation, memory, exams, and wellness. According to the instructions of the questionnaire, the minimum and maximum scores were 0 and 90, respectively; scores of 60 and above were considered as the desirable study habits; scores between 31 and 59 were considered relatively desirable, and scores below 30 were considered as undesirable [17]. To determine the validity, the content validity method, and the completed forms of the Content Validity Index (CVI) and the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were used along with the comments of 10 professors at the Rasht University of Nursing and Midwifery. In every question in all the eight domains relating to study habits, scores between 0.76 and 1 was obtained for the three criteria, simplicity, clarity, and relevance score, while scores between 0.85 and 0.97 provided the results of the content validity. The questionnaire’s reliability was examined in the two stages of retest on 20 nursing students of the Rasht University of Nursing and Midwifery in a span of 10 days. The correlation coefficient between the domains was obtained as 0.89; Cronbach's alpha was determined for the internal consistency of the domains that were generally obtained for all the aspects equalling 0.88; these were acceptable in terms of measuring. Each student's Grade Point Average was used to assess their academic performance. The names of students along with their GPA were taken from the Department of Education and were recorded in the questionnaire after asking students questions. Achieving a score of 17 and above was considered as a good performance; a score of 14–16.99 was considered as a moderate performance; and the score of 13.99 or lower was considered as a weak performance. After obtaining authorization by the Research Council of the Guilan University of Medical Sciences and the Ethics Committee of the Department of Research and Technology by the end of the semester in the first half of 2013, we referred to the desired colleges; the consent forms and the questionnaires were given to the students and were collected after completion. Data were collected after coding and they were entered into the SPSS software (version 22).
In order to categorize and summarize the data, descriptive statistics such as the mean, the standard deviation, and frequency distribution tables were used. To determine the study methods, the frequency distribution of study habit methods was carried out by items separation. In reviewing the study habits based on the scores obtained, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was first used; the Spearman correlation coefficient was then used to investigate the relationship between academic performance and study habits. In order to determine these relationships by individual-social variables’ control, the multiple linear regression model was used. To determine the predictors of academic performance based on study habits, logistic regression was used by the Backward method, with entry = 0.05 and removal = 0.1.
Results
The results of this study show that the majority of the participants in the study were female (65.1%), single (87.2%), single and without a history of failure (92.6%), living in dormitories (51.81%), and non-native (51%).