Volume 33, Issue 1 (1-2023)                   JHNM 2023, 33(1): 25-33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nemati R, Vahedparast H, Rashedi Y, Mirzaei K, Bahreini M. The Role of Personality Factors in Predicting Resilience and Coping Styles of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-sectional Study. JHNM 2023; 33 (1) :25-33
URL: http://hnmj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-2007-en.html
1- Instructor, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
3- Nursing (MSN), Student Research Committee, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
4- Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
5- Professor, Department of Psychiatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 489 kb]   (460 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (724 Views)
Full-Text:   (240 Views)
Introduction
Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) tend to be chronic and result from a combination of genetic, physiological, environmental, and behavioral factors [1]. Among NCDs, diabetes is a major, extensive, and costly public health problem [2]. The World Health Organization statistics show that the number of people with diabetes has increased, and the prevalence of this disease is increasing faster in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries [3]. In Iran, the prevalence of diabetes in 2011 among people aged 25-70 years was 11.9%. By 2030, more than 9 million people will be suffering from the disease [4]. People with diabetes live with many limitations, such as frequent insulin injections, high pharmaceutical supply costs, a special diet, recurrent infections, repeated hospitalizations due to disease complications, as well as problems like infertility, family relationships, sexual health, and employment [5, 6]. All of these factors can ultimately damage the psychological health of the patients [5]. Therefore, the risk of developing chronic diseases is related to various psychological factors and behavioral and physiological risks [7].
Considering the prevalence of psychological complications among people with diabetes, physicians should pay attention to psychological variables, especially supportive variables [8]. Resilience is one of the psychological components that play a prominent supporting role and has been conceptualized as one of the main bases for motivation, excitement, and behavior. Resilience is a factor in adapting to adversity; in other words, it enables the individual to adapt successfully to the environment, despite threatening conditions [9].
Long-term exposure to diabetes stressors and their self-management activities leads to fatigue and depression in patients, and the disease is extremely affected by a person’s ability to respond to these stressors [10]. In addition, resilience and positive emotions strengthen the person to effectively deal with the disease and its complications [11]. Coping strategies are among the skills that provide stability against damage, problems, and diseases. Coping strategies, a person applies affect not only mental health but also physical well-being [12]. Each person shows a specific emotion and behavior when dealing with stressors depending on their personality traits [12]. In this regard, personality traits are important factors for adaptation to stressful situations [13]. 
In Iran, the study’s results suggested that the higher the neuroticism of the elderly, the lower their self-confidence, and also, the more their desire for new experiences, extraversion, responsibility, and adaptation increased, the more confident they become to practice self-care [14]. Also, another study proved that diabetics’ extroversion and conscientious personality traits have a positive relationship with blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes [15]. On the contrary, Cheng et al. reported conscientiousness as the only effective factor for developing type 2 diabetes [16]. There is little research on the relationship between personality traits and resilience in patients with type 2 diabetes, except for a few studies that have assessed features related to emotional instability in people with diabetes [17, 18]. Therefore, the current study explores the role of personality traits in predicting resilience and coping strategies of patients with type 2 diabetes living in Bushehr City, Iran.

Materials and Methods
This study is cross-sectional, and the research population included all people with diabetes referred to the healthcare centers in Bushehr, Iran, in the north of the Persian Gulf. The subjects were selected by convenience sampling method. The data collection process lasted for two months in the summer of 2018. Health centers were selected from different regions in the north, south, west, east, and center of the city. Health centers in each region were selected based on the higher referral of patients.
The inclusion criteria were as follows: having type 2 diabetes (non-insulin-dependent); being over 18 years old; having been diagnosed with the disease during the last year; lacking severe psychological disorders (self-report), serious medical condition such as chronic kidney disease, cancer, blood disorders (self-report), drug addiction, gestational diabetes; and being willing to participate in the research. This information was obtained based on health records and patients’ reports. The exclusion criterion was returning an incomplete questionnaire.
To calculate the sample size, assuming a predictor variable for coping strategies and a predictor variable for resilience using the green formula (N=104+K), the minimum sample size was estimated at 107. To increase the study’s validity and consider potential dropouts, the sample size was chosen to be 120.
The study instruments were the demographic information form, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), 60-item Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Personality Inventory (NEO-PI), and Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ). Notably, the variables of resilience and coping strategies were considered predictive, while personality traits were regarded as the criterion variable.
Connor and Davidson developed the 25-item CD-RISC in 2003 [19]. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (never, low, moderate, high, and extremely high), where a response of never is scored zero and a response of extremely high is scored four. The minimum and maximum scores are 0 and 100, respectively. A high score on this scale reflects strong resilience. The validity and reliability of this tool have been confirmed by Hosseini et al. in Iran [20].
The NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) with 60 items was developed by Costa and McCrae [21]. The instrument evaluates 5 factors: neuroticism, extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness. The items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale (completely disagree=0 to completely agree=4). The validity and reliability of this tool have been confirmed by Garousi Farshi et al. in Iran [22].
Endler and Parker developed CSQ in 1990 to determine how people handle their problems [23]. It includes 48 items and evaluates three coping styles: problem-oriented, emotion-oriented, and avoidance. Problem-oriented coping is defined as controlling emotions and planning for stepwise problem-solving. In an emotion-oriented coping style, the individual focuses on the emotions raised from the situation instead of focusing on the problem itself, attempting to reduce negative emotions instead of solving the problem. On the other hand, avoidance coping involves trying to avoid stressors. In this questionnaire, items are scored on a 5-point Likert scale from never (1 score) to very much (5 score). Therefore, the minimum and maximum scores of the tool are 16 and 80, respectively, where a higher score indicates using the coping strategy more often. The validity and reliability of this tool have been confirmed by Ghoreyshirad et al. in Iran [24].
The samples completed the questionnaires in the presence of the researcher in a quiet place. In addition, explanations about the questions were provided where required. For the illiterate subjects, the questionnaire was read out and explained to them by the researcher.
Data analysis was performed in SPSS software, version 22 using descriptive statistics (percentage, frequency, mean and standard deviation, and domain) and multiple linear regression tests to determine the role of personality traits in predicting resilience and coping strategies of patients with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, a P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results
Results showed that 60.8% of the samples were female, and most were married (92.5%). In addition, 85.8% had a high-school diploma or lower education. Their Mean±SD age was 56.69±11.48 years with an age range of 24-84 years. Their Mean±SD duration of diabetes was 1.81±0.66 years with a range of 1-3 years (Table 1).

The results indicated that patients with type 2 diabetes had more openness (38.26±4.52) and neuroticism (35.97±6.87), while conscientiousness was lower in these patients (30.19±4.21) compared to other personality traits. The Mean±SD resilience score of the participants was 35.43±14.2 with a range of 5-77. Moreover, the results showed that the participants employed the emotion-oriented (51.09±5.09) and avoidance (50.47±4.20) coping strategies more often, compared to the problem-oriented coping strategies (44.89±6.92).
To investigate the relationship between demographic factors and personality traits with coping strategies, we used multivariate linear regression. According to the results, neuroticism was the only personality trait that could predict problem-oriented coping strategies in patients with type 2 diabetes (B=-4.38, 95% CI; -6.883 to 1.880, P=0.001). Moreover, different personality traits explained only 22% of problem-oriented strategies. Among the demographic traits of the subjects, there was a significant relationship between marital status and problem-oriented coping strategies (P=0.046). In terms of predicting emotion-oriented coping strategies by personality traits, neuroticism was the only personality type that could predict emotion-oriented strategies in patients with type 2 diabetes (B=2.68, 95% CI; -0.666 to 4.701, P=0.01). Furthermore, different personality types explained only 7% of emotion-oriented strategies, and there was no significant relationship between the demographic traits of the participants and emotion-based strategies. Regarding the assessment of prediction of avoidance coping strategies by personality traits, only the variable of neuroticism could predict avoidance coping strategies in type 2 diabetes (B=2.60, 95% CI; -0.961 to 4.248, P=0.002). Moreover, different personality types explained only 4% of avoidance coping strategies, and there was no relationship between demographic characteristics and avoidance strategies (Table 2).

The results indicated that the neuroticism personality trait predicted resilience in patients with type 2 diabetes. In addition, the variables of gender and place of residence played a significant role (Table 3).

The predictor variables in the model explained about 9% of the changes in the resilience variable (Adjusted R2=0.096).

Discussion
The results of this study suggested a significant negative relationship between neuroticism and problem-oriented coping strategies, which explained the decrease in the use of problem-oriented coping strategies caused by increased neuroticism. Therefore, among the personality traits, only neuroticism could predict problem-oriented strategies in the participants. Moreover, our findings indicated a significant positive association between neuroticism and the prediction of emotion-oriented and avoidance coping strategies in the patients. A study in Iran reported that patients with neuroticism applied emotion-oriented strategies to solve their problems [25]. In a study conducted in France by Verges et al., researchers found that type A personality, characterized by competition and the need for success, was significantly less common in type 2 diabetics with diabetic foot ulcers [26]. 
The results of this study are in line with their results. In studies by Amiri et al. [27] and Kameli et al. [28] on female cancer patients and male addicts, all participants had higher neuroticism and resorted to emotion-oriented coping strategies, thereby experiencing mood disorder symptoms more severely. People with chronic diseases or high-risk behaviors (e.g. addiction) more often apply emotion-based strategies in handling stressful situations. However, we justified our findings based on the fact that most participants had a low level of education and were female, which could affect the results due to differences in the male and female genders in terms of lifestyle, social education, and socialization in society and family. The findings of another study also indicated a positive relationship between education level and complications of diabetes, and the researchers found that these patients had a low quality of life [29].
Our findings are not consistent with the results obtained by Ramandi et al., which showed no significant relationship between problem-oriented coping strategies and psychological symptoms of diabetic patients, such as neuroticism [30]. This inconsistency between the results might be attributed to the selection of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the mentioned study. Meanwhile, there are higher rates of obsessive-compulsive disorder in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to patients with type 2 diabetes [31]. Therefore, this factor might have affected the results and the difference between the results of these studies. NEO-PI was used in the present study, whereas Ramandi et al. employed the SCL-90-R, which evaluates and presents only the symptoms of the last week. Therefore, the symptoms may change during the previous weeks. However, we assessed the personality traits of patients with diabetes. A study shows that many people think of personality as being fixed and unchangeable [7]. This difference can be a reason for the discrepancy in results. 
In another study, Esmaeili et al. reported a significant relationship between neuroticism and resilience in patients with multiple sclerosis [32]. In a study in Ireland, McDonnell et al. found that participants with higher levels of neuroticism tended to have lower levels of resilience that predicted symptoms of depression [33]. Moreover, Mansouri et al. found a direct relationship between the mentioned personality trait and resilience. They also found a significant positive association between extraversion and resilience [34]. In a study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, the results showed that neuroticism was inversely related to resilience. People with neurotic personality traits were less resilient and more vulnerable to coronavirus crisis stressors [35]. The present study showed that most patients with diabetes had a neurotic personality type, which could reduce the amount of resilience. Patients with diabetes mostly apply emotion-based coping strategies in dealing with this disease and other life problems. There was a direct relationship between neuroticism and emotion-oriented coping strategies. The results indicated that as the number of diabetic patients is growing in Iran, besides paying attention to etiological factors, it is necessary to consider the psychological and personality components of these patients and to better understand and adapt to their physical and mental conditions.
This study, like most research studies, has its limitations. Since the study was cross-sectional, a causal relationship between variables cannot be concluded from the findings; thus, longitudinal studies are recommended to overcome this limitation. The data in this study were collected self-reportedly so that self-report bias may occur. It is suggested that qualitative studies be conducted to examine in more depth the feelings, experiences, and beliefs of diabetic patients, especially in the field of its psychological aspects. In addition, having no psychological disorders among the subjects was only based on self-report, which can also increase bias. Therefore, it is suggested that in future studies, tools for diagnosing mental disorders be used to assess mental disorders in patients, and then patients with eligible conditions be included in the study.
Recognizing the relationship between psychological components such as personality and internal diseases (e.g. diabetes) can justify applying psychological interventions in these patients. Since diabetes imposes much stress on the patient and their family, it is necessary for psychiatric nurses to instruct these patients in problem-solving and problem-oriented methods so that they can play a role in improving their mental and physical health through controlling stress. Although diabetic patients have different personality traits, which determine their coping strategies and resilience, they can be changed and improved with education, and it is necessary to focus on this issue in patients’ treatment plans.

Ethical Considerations
Compliance with ethical guidelines

The current study was approved by the Research Council of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (code of ethics: IR.BPUMS.REC.1397.043). The participants delivered their written informed consent ahead of conducting the study. The researchers adhered to ethical considerations by obtaining informed consent from the participants and assuring them that their personal information would be kept confidential. Furthermore, participation in the study was voluntary, and the participants could leave at any stage.

Funding
The study was supported by Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.

Authors' contributions
The chief investigator, project supervisor, the principal student investigator and oversight of the project design: Masoud Bahreini; Project designer: Yaghoub Rashedi and Reza Nemati, with advice from Kamran Mirzaei and Hakimeh Vahedparast; Providing statistical advice for the design data collection, analysis, and randomization: Kamran Mirzaei; Preparing the initial writing after all authors approval: Reza Nemati. All authors read, revised, and approved the final article.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no competing interest.

Acknowledgments
This study is part of the Master’s thesis fulfilled by Yaghob Rashedi in Psychiatric Nursing. The researchers hereby express their gratitude and appreciation to the Vice-Chancellor for Research, the Student Research Committee, and the Clinical Research Development Center of the Persian Gulf Martyrs Hospital of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran. We would also like to thank all the professors, specialists, and patients who participated in this study.

References
  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [Link]
  2. Mensing C, Boucher J, Cypress M, Weinger K, Mulcahy K, Barta P, et al. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(1):72-9. [DOI:10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.S72] [PMID]
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. [Link]
  4. Esteghamati A, Larijani B, Aghajani MH, Ghaemi F, Kermanchi J, Shahrami A, et al. Diabetes in Iran: Prospective analysis from first nationwide diabetes report of national program for prevention and control of diabetes (NPPCD-2016). Scientific Reports. 2017; 7(1):13461. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-13379-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
  5. Afkhami Ardekani M, Zare H, Alipor A, Poursharifi H, Arab Sheibani K. [Correlation between self efficacy, type D personality and health locus of control with control of blood sugar in patients with diabetes type II (Persian)]. Journal of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical sciences. 2013; 20(6):805-13. [Link]
  6. Zare O, Simbar M, Ozgoli G, Bahar A, Alavi Majd H. Gestational diabetes as a predictor of sexual dysfunction in pregnant women. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery. 2021; 31(2):114-23. [DOI:10.32598/jhnm.31.2.2075]
  7. van Dooren FE, Denollet J, Verhey FR, Stehouwer CD, Sep SJ, Henry RM, et al. Psychological and personality factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus, presenting the rationale and exploratory results from the maastricht study, a population-based cohort study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016; 16(1):17. [DOI:10.1186/s12888-016-0722-z] [PMID] [PMCID]
  8. Feghhi H, Saadatjoo A, Dastjerdi R. [Psychosocial adaptation in patients with type 2 diabetes referring to diabetes research center of Birjand in 2013 (Persian)]. Modern Care Journal. 2013; 10(4):249-56. [Link]
  9. Stephens TM, Smith P, Cherry C. Promoting resilience in new perioperative nurses. AORN Journal. 2017; 105(3):276-84. [DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2016.12.019] [PMID]
  10. Stone S, Raman A, Fleming S. Behavioral characteristics among obese/overweight inner-city African American children: A secondary analysis of participants in a community-based type 2 diabetes risk reduction program. Children and Youth Services Review. 2010; 32(6):833-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.02.002]
  11. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL, Feldman Barrett L. Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. Journal of Personality. 2004; 72(6):1161-90. [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00294.x] [PMID] [PMCID]
  12. Pedersen SS, Denollet J. Type D personality, cardiac events, and impaired quality of life: A review. European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation. 2003; 10(4):241-8. [DOI:10.1097/00149831-200308000-00005] [PMID]
  13. Powell TJ, Enright SJ. Anxiety and stress management. London: Routledge; 2015. [DOI:10.4324/9781315683867]
  14. Sadeghi H, Akbarzadeh Amirdehi M, Taheri E, Hajialibeigi K, Mirsamei F, Shabani Y, et al. [The Relationship between personality traits and confidence in diabetes self-care in the elderly with type 2 diabetes (Persian)]. Journal of Health and Care. 2021; 23(2):133-44. [DOI:10.52547/jhc.23.2.133]
  15. Esmaeilinasab M, Ebrahimi M, Mokarrar MH, Rahmati L, Mahjouri MY, Arzaghi SM. Type II diabetes and personality; A study to explore other psychosomatic aspects of diabetes. Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders. 2016; 15(1):54. [DOI:10.1186/s40200-016-0281-3] [PMID] [PMCID]
  16. Cheng H, Treglown L, Montgomery S, Furnham A. Associations between familial factor, trait conscientiousness, gender and the occurrence of type 2 diabetes in adulthood: Evidence from a British cohort. Plos One. 2015; 10(5):e0122701. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122701] [PMID] [PMCID]
  17. Scaruffi E, Gambineri A, Cattaneo S, Turra J, Vettor R, Mioni R. Personality and psychiatric disorders in women affected by polycystic ovary syndrome. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2014; 5:185. [DOI:10.3389/fendo.2014.00185] [PMID] [PMCID]
  18. Nanjundappa G, Friis R, Taladrid B. Type A personalty: Hispanic and anglo diabetes and cardiovascular disease. International Migration Review. 1987; 21(3):643-55. [DOI:10.1177/019791838702100311]
  19. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety. 2003; 18(2):76-82. [DOI:10.1002/da.10113] [PMID]
  20. Hosseini S, Mohammadi H, Saadat Z. [Investigating the psychometric properties of the cognitive resilience scale in a sample of Iranian society (Persian)]. Quarterly of Educational Measurement. 2020; 11(42):125-50. [Link]
  21. Costa PT, McCrae RR. Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO personality inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988; 54(5):853-63. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853] [PMID]
  22. Garousi Farshi MT, Mehryar AH, Ghazi Tabatabie M. [The application of the new NEO personality test (NEO) and the analysis of its characteristics and factor structure among the students of Iranian universities (Persian)]. Journal of Humanities. 2011; 11(39):173-98. [Link]
  23. Endler NS, Parker JD. Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment. 1994; 6(1):50-60. [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.6.1.50]
  24. Ghoreyshi Rad F. [Validation of Endler & Parker coping scale of stressful situations (Persian)]. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 4(1):1-7. [Link]
  25. Rahimi R, Salimi Bajestani H. [Personality factors and coping strategies based problem solving and emotion in men and women with and without type 2 diabetes (Persian)]. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2017; 9(1):75-88. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jnkums.9.1.75]
  26. Verges B, Brands R, Fourmont C, Petit J-M, Simoneau I, Rouland A, et al. Fewer type A personality traits in type 2 diabetes patients with diabetic foot ulcer. Diabetes & Metabolism. 2021; 47(6):101245. [DOI:10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101245] [PMID]
  27. Amiri M, Mohamadi B, Gheydari S. [The relationship between big five personality traits, coping styles and social support with depression in woman under follow-up for breast cancer (Persian)]. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 7(2):192-200. [DOI:10.22037/JRM.2017.110740.1496]
  28. Kameli D, Hojjat S, Jajarmi M, Abedi A, Kameli T. [Comparison between personality traits and copying strategies in substance dependent men and non dependent group (Persian)]. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. 2014; 5(4):813-9. [DOI:10.29252/jnkums.5.4.813]
  29. Soleimani Kamran J, Jafroudi S, KazemNejad Leili E, Sedighi Chafjiri A, Paryad E. Quality of Life in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery. 2017; 27(1):69-77. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.hnmj.27.1.69]
  30. Ramandi M, Shareh H, Siltani E, Mirzaee A. [Role of coping strategies in the psychological problems of patients with diabetes (Persian)]. Scientific Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. 2013; 21(3):163-73. [Link]
  31. Talaei A. Comparison of psychopathology in type1 and type2 diabetic patients. European Psychiatry. 2009; 24(S1):1-1. [DOI:10.1016/S0924-9338(09)71212-X]
  32. Esmaeili M, Etemaddar N, Gholampoor U. [The relationship between personality and coping styles according to the mediating role of resilience in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (Persian)]. Journal of Fasa University of Medical Sciences. 2017; 6(4):504-11. [Link]
  33. McDonnell S, Semkovska M. Resilience as mediator between extraversion, neuroticism, and depressive symptoms in university students. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2020; 4(1):26-40. [Link]
  34. Mansouri Z, Mousavi-Nasab H, Shamsodini Lori L. [A study of the mediating role of resilience in personality characteristics and attitudes toward delinquency (Persian)]. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2015; 17(2):103-10. [Link]
  35. Zager Kocjan G, Kavčič T, Avsec A. Resilience matters: Explaining the association between personality and psychological functioning during the covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2021; 21(1):100198. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.08.002] [PMID] [PMCID]
Article Type : Research | Subject: General
Received: 2021/06/19 | Accepted: 2022/06/7 | Published: 2023/01/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.