TY - JOUR JF - gums-hnmj JO - JHNM VL - 22 IS - 1 PY - 2012 Y1 - 2012/4/01 TI - Comparative survey between quantitative and qualitative paradigms (part II)‎ TT - مقایسه پارادایم های مطالعات کمی و کیفی(قسمت دوّم)‏ N2 - As stated in the first part of article, we have stated the four major philosophical paradigms ‎which make up the basis for knowledge(epistemology), the nature and reality(ontology) and ‎the acquisition methods of knowledge(methodology). Thus, according to each paradigm, ‎approach to knowledge is determined. ‎‏ ‏ In a more general category, we have two quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Today that ‎method is called quantitative or scientific method, derived from positivism. On this basis, only ‎the experimental scientific method is valid method of research. On the other hand, qualitative ‎methods focused on natural position therefore, these studies are sometimes called naturalistic ‎study. ‎ Since paradigmatic confrontation occurs in fundamental questions of each paradigm, ‎researchers use different sources to determine two paradigms' answer to basic questions, and ‎tables are made to comprise them. Finally the importance of each was emphasized.‎ SP - 54 EP - 60 AU - Emami Sigaroodi, Abdolhosein AU - Salsali, Mahvash AU - Basiri, HAdi AD - KW - Qualitative Research/research/Philosophy KW - Nursing UR - http://hnmj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-179-en.html ER -