Volume 26, Number 3 (9-2016)                   J Holist Nurs Midwifery 2016, 26(3): 55-64 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shafiepour S Z, Sadegh R, JafariAsl M, Kazemnejad Leili E. Aggression in Different Types of Attachment in Adolescents. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2016; 26 (3) :55-64
URL: http://hnmj.gums.ac.ir/article-1-754-en.html

, shafipourz@yahoo.com
Full-Text [PDF 221 kb]   (502 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1221 Views)
Full-Text:   (366 Views)

Patient Education Barriers from Nurses’ Opinions

  • Ranjbar Ezzatabadi M1, Mahdian M2, Eslami H3*, Amini A4

1-Ph.D of Health Policy, Health Policy Research Center, School of public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

2- Department of Healthcare Management, School of public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

3-Ph.D Condidate in Environmental Health, School of public health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

4-Ph.D Condidate in Hematology, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2014/02/24                                                                                                                                            Accepted: 2014/12/10

Abstract

Introduction: Patient education is one of the important aspects of nursing care and is among nursing key roles in delivery of health services.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the barriers to patient education from nurses' viewpoint employed in educational hospitals affiliated to Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd.

Methods: This study was a cross-sectional and descriptiveanalytical study in which 162 nursing personnel were selected by stratified-random sampling method. In order to perform the sampling according to the population of each hospital, the numbers of samples were determined. Data were collected with a two-part questionnaire. First part contained personal and demographic information such as age, sex, marital status, education and working experience. The second part included 19 questions on patient education barriers which evaluated four domains of working conditions, management, nursing attitude and training skills. The data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and chi-square statistical test. Answers were designed based on a Likert scale from low to average and high impact with scores of 1-3, respectively. In management domain, the scores ranged from 6 to 18. Scores less than 10 showed "low impact", 10 to 14 "average impact" and more than 14 "high impact". In the domain of ​​working conditions, similar scores were obtained. The findings displayed that nurses' attitude ranged from 2 to 6 scores. Scores less than 3 showed "low impact", 3-4.5 "average impact" and more than 4.5 "high impact". In domain of training skills, scores ranged from 5 to 15. Scores less than 8 indicated "low impact", 8 to 11.5 "average impact" and more than 11.5 "high impact". The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and chi-square. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Health Faculty, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd.

Results: In this study, 149 of the 162 questionnaires were answered indicating92% response rate. The data showed that 45.2% of male nurses and 47.3% of female nurses blamed working condition barriers with highest impact on the implementation of patient education. Moreover, 45.8% of single and 47.5% of married nurses had the same opinion. Chi-square test found no significant relationship between the variables of age, sex, working experience, employment status, marital status, and educational level with patient education barriers (P≥0.05).

The data showed that 31.5% of nurses believed that barriers related to management had the greatest impact on the implementation of patient education followed by 47.7% barriers to working condition, 2.7% attitude of nurses and 14.1% training skills. Chi-square test showed a significant correlation between the domains of working condition and type of hospital (P=0.048). Working condition was proved as the most important factor. Management was the second factor followed by training skills as the third. Finally, ​​attitude of nurses was identified as the least important patient education barrier.

The results of the present study revealed three factors with highest impact as education barriers in nurses' opinion; high working load (74.5%), insufficient nursing stuff in wards (71.8%) and nursing shifts in a row (70.4%) in working condition domain. The study population reported three factors with lowest impact; training as a specific task assigned for doctors (54.4%), lack of nurses ‘self-confidence for training (43.5%) and not delivering the trainings to patients (40.3%).

Conclusion: In attention to that the domain of nurses working conditions had the greatest impact on the education of the patients, it is recommended that official authorities to maintain nursing resource in hospitals and reduce their workload and provide facilities and conditions for educational programs to encourage nurses to consider this important issue.

Keywords: Patient education, Hospital Nursing Staff, Hospitals

Corresponding Author:  Hadi Eslami, Yazd, School of public health

Email:Hadieslami1986@yahoo.com

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2016/09/14 | Accepted: 2016/09/14 | Published: 2016/09/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2017 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Holistic Nursing And Midwifery

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb